Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 15:23:23 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00570] Re: Inerop.1.7
To: Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080207152323.5dfb1ff0.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <47AA1FEF.9030305@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <47AA1FEF.9030305@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00570

Hi, Yao.

They can be omitted if you support RFC 5095.
It can be the same manner as conformance testing.

Please also refer beta version of scenario
<http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_PhaseII_Base_Interop_version_2_9_0.pdf>.

It was described as "Possible Problems:" in that time.

Thanks,


On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:00:31 -0700
Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Hi Akisada-san,
> 
> Since RH0 is deprecated, do we still need to test "Routing header 
> processing"?
> 
> Thanks,
> Yao
> 
> 
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>