Hi, Yao.
You can skip interop 1.7,
but in that case, you have to be FAIL for conformance test v1.4.9.
At the same time, you need to test with conformance test v1.5.0bX.
You need to indicate
that your node can send back ICMPv6 Parameter Problem against RH0.
Skipping RH0 test cases aren't enough to indicate disabling RH0.
Thanks,
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008 09:17:04 -0700
Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Thanks Yukiyo.
>
> We are thinking to omit this test because it doesn't add value in the
> future. But I still have a question. In conformance test, we managed to
> configure our software flags to pass RH0 related tests the way Self_Test
> 1.4.9 wanted (not default behavior). The questions is if we omit Interop
> 1.7, should we leave those RH0 related conformance tests fail to be
> consistent?
>
> Thanks,
> Yao
>
> Yukiyo Akisada wrote:
> > Hi, Yao.
> >
> > They can be omitted if you support RFC 5095.
> > It can be the same manner as conformance testing.
> >
> > Please also refer beta version of scenario
> > <http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_PhaseII_Base_Interop_version_2_9_0.pdf>.
> >
> > It was described as "Possible Problems:" in that time.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:00:31 -0700
> > Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Hi Akisada-san,
> >>
> >> Since RH0 is deprecated, do we still need to test "Routing header
> >> processing"?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Yao
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
> >
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>