Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:16:46 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00595] Re: Query on interop testing for IPv6ReadyLogoPhase1
To: "rukmangada Katthem" <rukmangada.k@gmail.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080214091646.5d5e015e.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <eebe75d70802130126m6a42aeaen8255b888993ebcef@mail.gmail.com>
References: <eebe75d70802120213i4ef956cfnd4a44253fe344c7a@mail.gmail.com>	<20080213092437.9ca2f77f.akisada@tahi.org>	<eebe75d70802130126m6a42aeaen8255b888993ebcef@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00595

Hi, K R Naidu.

No, you still need 2 hosts and 2 routers as counterpart devices.

In each of test scenarios,
only one counterpart device is requires.
Then you must repeat the same test scenario with swapping counterpart devices.

For example,
there are 4 counterpart devices like below.

    Host1    : Vendor A
    Host2    : Vendor B
    Router1  : Vendor C
    Router2  : Vendor D

If your device is the host, you must perform IP6Interop.1.1.a.
In IP6Interop.1.1.a, your device is always TAR-Host1.
TAR-Host2 is Vendor A at 1st test.
TAR-Host2 is Vendor B at 2nd test.

In IP6Interop.1.1.b, your device is also always TAR-Host1.
And TAR-Router 1 is Vendor C at 1st test.
Then TAR-Router 1 is Vendor D at 2nd test.

Thanks,


On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:56:24 +0530
"rukmangada Katthem" <rukmangada.k@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi ,
> 
> Thanks for your early comment.
> 
> As Per document for phase-1, Only one vendor router is required.
> And One Host required. [Other then target i.e NUT]
> 
> Our Device is Host Device.
> 
> Now Please Let me know whether 4 different vendor device are required for
> interop. in Phase-1 ?
> Because on below link it's mention 4 different vendor device is must .
> http://www.ipv6ready.org/about_phase1.html
> 
> 1) Self-test (inhouse test) base application
> 100% pass for Self-test based on the test specification.
> *4 interoperable devices(*4) from other vendors including 2 hosts and 2
> routers*.
> 
> We are planing to use FreeBSD as a router and WindowsXP as Host.
> Is this two device works fine for Phase-1 Interop ??
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> K R Naidu
> 
> 
> On 2/13/08, Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org> wrote:
> > Hi, K R Naidu.
> >
> > Talking about interoperability test, using vel isn't mandated.
> > You can use it if you want, and vice versa.
> >
> > Test scenario itself is described in
> > <
> http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_PhaseII_Base_Interop_version_2_8_4.pdf
> >.
> >
> > And filename syntax to submit is described in
> > <http://www.ipv6ready.org/pdf/IPv6Ready_P2_interop_1-8.pdf>.
> >
> > Only these two documents are needed.
> >
> > In <IPv6Ready_PhaseII_Base_Interop_version_2_8_4.pdf>,
> > you can see which tests must be performed for Phase-1 at page 8.
> > The title is "Tests performed on Host/Router".
> >
> > You only need to perform the tests marked as "X" in Phase-I column.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:43:44 +0530
> > "rukmangada Katthem" <rukmangada.k@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We are working for achieving IPv6 Ready Logo Phase1.
> > >
> > > We have completed conformance test suit (Selftest).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Now We are planning to Do interoperability test for Phase-1, But we
> > > are confuse with lot of document available for introp.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So please let us know what exact test scenarios we need to run for
> introp.
> > >
> > > Also do we need to run tool VEL.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please provide us document which states about scenarios for Phase-1
> introp.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Any help will be appreciated.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > K R Naidu
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
> >
> 


------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>