Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:17:37 +0900
From: Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [users:00615] Re: sample IPv6Ready Phase 2 Interoperability file list for router device
To: users@tahi.org
Cc: Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com>,        Mike SCHMIDT <Mike.Schmidt@alcatel-lucent.com>
Message-Id: <20080228071737.71462620.mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <47C5A4CF.8020102@alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <47C48CD8.9070705@alcatel-lucent.com>	<20080227102157.f66f4ca4.mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<20080227103601.d615e338.mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>	<47C5A4CF.8020102@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00615

On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:58:39 -0700
Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

> Hi Miruru,
> 
> Many thanks to you. This definitely will give us a good list to check 
> against. I'd appreciate if you can answer a few more question for me,
> 
> Is there a reason you separated host vs router and router vs router 
> cases? Is there a reason you separated one host from another host, one 
> router from another router? It's more clear to me the way you did it, 
> but is it what IPv6ready reviewer wants? Your directory structure looks 
> like
> 
>     host_TAR_H1/1.1.DEF ....
>                            /1.2.CD ...
>                            .....
>    
>     host_TAR_H2/1.1.DEF...
>                            /1.2.CD ...
>                            .....
> 
>     router_TAR_R1/1.1.GHI ...
>                             /1.2.EF ...
>                            ..... 
> 
>     router_TAR_R2/1.1.GHI ...
>                             /1.2.EF ...
>                            ..... 
> 
> We are more thinking like
> 
>     1.1/ *.topology, *.result, *.dump for H1, H2, R1, R2
>     1.2/ *.topology, *.result, *.dump for H1, H2, R1, R2
> 
> Do you see any problem with that? Is there a directory convention here?

I wan't pointed out this by reviewer. I did so at first.
However if we do so, some of the filenames will be duplicated.
(e.g. 1.6.B.REF.<My_Vendor>.result)

Best Regards,
----
Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>


> Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:21:57 +0900
> > Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >   
> >> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 15:04:08 -0700
> >> Yinghui Yao <Yinghui.Yao@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>     
> >>> Could anyone who has passed the Phase 2 Interoperability test give me a 
> >>> list of files you submitted? I really appreciate it. Our file name 
> >>> didn't satisfy the reviewer's standard. I'm especially interested in 
> >>> 1.2.C-F.
> >>>       
> >> Here's the list of files I submitted for Phase-2 Router Logo.
> >> Our vendor name is KernelOrg.
> >> The counter host's vendor name is KAME.
> >> The counter router's vendor name is FreeBSD.
> >> # Actually, there were files for one more host and router.
> >>     
> >
> > Excuse me, I forgot to I was pointed out that one of filenames
> > was wrong. "1.6.A.KAME.REF.result" is wrong. The correct name is
> > "1.6.A.REF.KAME.result"
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > ----
> > Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >
> >
> >   
> >> $ ls -RF host_KAME router_FreeBSD
> >> host_KAME:
> >> 1.1.DEF.KAME/  1.4.KAME/    1.6.D.KAME/
> >> 1.2.CD.KAME/   1.5.KAME/    1.7.A.KAME/
> >> 1.3.ABC.KAME/  1.6.A.KAME/  KernelOrg_Linux_2.6.20.table
> >>
> >> host_KAME/1.1.DEF.KAME:
> >> 1.1.D.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.1.E.KAME.KernelOrg.result
> >> 1.1.D.KAME.KernelOrg.result         1.1.E.KernelOrg.KAME.result
> >> 1.1.D.KernelOrg.KAME.result         1.1.F.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump
> >> 1.1.DEF.KAME.topology               1.1.F.KAME.KernelOrg.result
> >> 1.1.E.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.1.F.KernelOrg.KAME.result
> >>
> >> host_KAME/1.2.CD.KAME:
> >> 1.2.C.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.2.D.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump
> >> 1.2.C.REF.KAME.result               1.2.D.REF.KAME.KernelOrg.result
> >> 1.2.C.REF.KernelOrg.result          1.2.D.REF.KernelOrg.KAME.result
> >> 1.2.CD.KAME.topology
> >>
> >> host_KAME/1.3.ABC.KAME:
> >> 1.3.A.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.3.B.REF.KAME.result
> >> 1.3.A.REF.KAME.result               1.3.C.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump
> >> 1.3.ABC.KAME.topology               1.3.C.REF.KAME.result
> >> 1.3.B.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump
> >>
> >> host_KAME/1.4.KAME:
> >> 1.4.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.4.KAME.topology
> >> 1.4.KAME.KernelOrg.Network2.dump  1.4.REF.KAME.result
> >>
> >> host_KAME/1.5.KAME:
> >> 1.5.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.5.KAME.topology
> >> 1.5.KAME.KernelOrg.Network2.dump  1.5.REF.KAME.result
> >>
> >> host_KAME/1.6.A.KAME:
> >> 1.6.A.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.6.A.KAME.REF.result
> >> 1.6.A.KAME.KernelOrg.Network2.dump  1.6.A.KAME.topology
> >>
> >> host_KAME/1.6.D.KAME:
> >> 1.6.D.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.6.D.KAME.KernelOrg.result
> >> 1.6.D.KAME.KernelOrg.Network2.dump  1.6.D.KAME.topology
> >> 1.6.D.KAME.KernelOrg.Network3.dump  1.6.D.KernelOrg.KAME.result
> >>
> >> host_KAME/1.7.A.KAME:
> >> 1.7.A.KAME.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.7.A.REF.KernelOrg.KAME.result
> >> 1.7.A.KAME.topology
> >>
> >> router_FreeBSD:
> >> 1.1.GHI.FreeBSD/  1.6.B.FreeBSD/  1.7.B.FreeBSD/
> >> 1.2.EF.FreeBSD/   1.6.E.FreeBSD/  KernelOrg_Linux_2.6.20.table
> >>
> >> router_FreeBSD/1.1.GHI.FreeBSD:
> >> 1.1.G.FreeBSD.KernelOrg.result         1.1.H.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.Network1.dump
> >> 1.1.G.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.Network1.dump  1.1.H.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.result
> >> 1.1.G.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.result         1.1.I.FreeBSD.KernelOrg.result
> >> 1.1.GHI.FreeBSD.topology               1.1.I.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.Network1.dump
> >> 1.1.H.FreeBSD.KernelOrg.result         1.1.I.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.result
> >>
> >> router_FreeBSD/1.2.EF.FreeBSD:
> >> 1.2.E.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.Network1.dump  1.2.F.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.Network1.dump
> >> 1.2.E.REF.FreeBSD.result               1.2.F.REF.FreeBSD.KernelOrg.result
> >> 1.2.E.REF.KernelOrg.result             1.2.F.REF.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.result
> >> 1.2.EF.FreeBSD.topology
> >>
> >> router_FreeBSD/1.6.B.FreeBSD:
> >> 1.6.B.FreeBSD.KernelOrg.Network1.dump  1.6.B.REF.FreeBSD.result
> >> 1.6.B.FreeBSD.KernelOrg.Network2.dump  1.6.B.REF.KernelOrg.result
> >> 1.6.B.FreeBSD.topology
> >>
> >> router_FreeBSD/1.6.E.FreeBSD:
> >> 1.6.E.FreeBSD.KernelOrg.result         1.6.E.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.Network2.dump
> >> 1.6.E.FreeBSD.topology                 1.6.E.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.Network3.dump
> >> 1.6.E.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.Network1.dump  1.6.E.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.result
> >>
> >> router_FreeBSD/1.7.B.FreeBSD:
> >> 1.7.B.FreeBSD.topology                 1.7.B.REF.FreeBSD.KernelOrg.result
> >> 1.7.B.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.Network1.dump  1.7.B.REF.KernelOrg.FreeBSD.result
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>