Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2008 16:31:27 -0500
From: Subhendu Ghosh <sghosh@redhat.com>
Subject: [users:00625] Re: Phase 2 Interop Results Table format
To: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <47CC6E2F.1020303@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF7096C75F.C96F92EE-ON86257401.0057409A-86257401.00586322@us.ibm.com>
References: <OF7096C75F.C96F92EE-ON86257401.0057409A-86257401.00586322@us.ibm.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00625

Christy L Norman wrote:
> 
> What kind of table file did everyone submit? Should it be a picture 
> (e.g. JPEG), something like an Excel file, an html, or just plain text 
> with something like this:
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> |                 |  Vendor X        |  Vendor A        |  Vendor B     
>     |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> | Vendor X        |      -----------        |       Pass        |   
>  Pass         |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> | Vendor A        |   Pass          |       -------------        |   
>  Pass         |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> | Vendor B        |   Pass                 |          Pass         |     
>   -------------         |
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> 
> 
> The last, text option seems like the worst to do but I wasn't sure what 
> Appendix A meant by, "in clear readable format (Appendix A, ver 1.9, Sec 
> 1.3.A)."
> 
> Also, what does: "... with technical explanations of the test procedures 
> and a simple summary of failures in the cover page (Appendix A, ver 1.9, 
> Sec 1.3.A)" mean?  What's an example of a "technical explanation?"
> 
> 

Text is always preferable.

-regards
Subhendu

	
625_2.x-vcard (attatchment)(tag is disabled)