Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 15:55:31 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00650] Re: Self_Test_1-5-0b4: RFC 4443
To: users@tahi.org
Cc: "Rommel Laranjo" <rslaranjo@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <20080401155531.1a5675d5.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <f051005f0803312345t290e4b13se498cb3e24ea73d4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f051005f0803312345t290e4b13se498cb3e24ea73d4@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00650

Hi, Rommel.

If you set DST_UNREACH_CODE_2_SUPPORT to non-zero in config.txt,
it must be RFC 4443.

DST_UNREACH_CODE_2_SUPPORT option will be removed by next major version up.
It means that this option will be mandated.

Please refer to <http://www.ipv6ready.org/announcement/announcement20080221.html>.

Thanks,



On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:45:44 +0800
"Rommel Laranjo" <rslaranjo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I tried to run Self_Test_1-5-0b4, and passed Section 5: RFC 2463 - ICMPv6.
> 
> My question is, is Section 5 of the self test already refers to RFC 4443?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rommel
> 
> 


-- 
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>