Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 08:48:44 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00682] Re: problem with pktrecv (3.0.12) and ct-2.1.1/default-addr-select
To: Karsten Keil <kkeil@suse.de>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080425084844.4ea03000.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080424130403.GA13911@pingi.kke.suse.de>
References: <20080414012727.GA17116@pingi.kke.suse.de>	<20080415202916.GA7354@pingi.kke.suse.de>	<20080424121752.GA12387@pingi.kke.suse.de>	<20080424212900.ebac1651.akisada@tahi.org>	<20080424130403.GA13911@pingi.kke.suse.de>
X-Mail-Count: 00682

Hi, Karsten.

On Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:04:03 +0200
Karsten Keil <kkeil@suse.de> wrote:

> I understand that.
> So far I known here are no newer tests for default address selection, or did
> I miss something ?

No.
It's the latest for the default address selection.


> > Anyway, your point about timestamp is correct.
> > And changing seektime at vRecv() must be done carefully.
> > 
> > I guess that you must insert vClear() before vSend() if you use 0 as seektime.
> > 
> 
> I understand, this makes sense.
> Looks this patch OK for you ?

I will review it, but it can be done after May.

You may know that, in Japan,
we will have 1 week national holiday
named as "Golden Week" from the end of Apr. to the beginning of May.

After that I must complete IKEv2 tester development in May.
I'm sorry for inconvenience on you.

Thanks,


-- 
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>