Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread] 
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 12:03:45 +0900 (JST)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Subject: [users:00721] Re: [4.0.0.b2] Judgement #2 is missing at v6LC3.2.1 tests
To: users@tahi.org, mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Message-Id: <20080523.120345.05287172.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080523114122.0e113a2d.mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20080523114122.0e113a2d.mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00721

In article <20080523114122.0e113a2d.mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (at Fri, 23 May 2008 11:41:22 +0900), Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com> says:

> This means RA may go into NUT during NUT is doing link-local DAD.
> Until link-local DAD is finished, we cannot decide whether we need
> to stop IP operation at the interface. Therefore, I think
> Judgment #2 might not be omitted.

In other words, the tests cannot assume that NUT accepts RA(s) during
DAD for link-local address.

--yoshfuji