Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 09:22:49 +0900
From: "K.Kawaguchi" <kawaguti@ysknet.co.jp>
Subject: [users:00735] Re: MIPv6 Conformance Test Suite
To: tammy_leino@mentor.com
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <200806040922.GBF34395.BXUBVHLJ@ysknet.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <2F83EB16CD718C43889CBCD31ECFD7F8753E37@na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com>
References: <2F83EB16CD718C43889CBCD31ECFD7F8753E37@na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00735

Hello,

If you want the result of stack of others you, please try the
test on other stack(s). For example, mipl, usagi, kame ..
(We do not offer stacks.)

If there is a point you of whose are unknown to a test result,
please send your test result to mipv6_support@v6pc.jp or me.
We verify and comment it.

Some hints.
- The test is supporting only RFC3775 and RFC3776. The expanded
  function of other Mobile are not supported.
  Please disable the expanded function of other Mobile.
- The packet format is being fixed to some patterns.
  The difference from the packet expected can check in the test
  result log.


Best Regards
--
Kiyoaki Kawaguchi



""Leino, Tammy" <tammy_leino@mentor.com>" wrote:

> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am running the TAHI MIPv6 conformance test suite against my proprietary 
Mobile IPv6 solution.
> 
> I am having much difficulty determining why my tests are failing, because 
the tests do not provide an explanation of why they are failing.  When I 
compare my packets to the JUDGEMENT section for each test, my packets look 
correct, but the test claims to fail.  Can you please send me the .html files 
for a successful execution of this test suite so I can compare my failing 
results with good results to determine why I fail.  I would really appreciate 
your assistance in this matter as I need to complete my testing quickly.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Tammy Leino
> 
> 
> 
> 
>