Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:32:20 +0000 From: "S, Sreenath" <sreenath.s@hp.com> Subject: [users:00740] Re: Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols To: "users@tahi.org" <users@tahi.org> Message-Id: <E230C7241C9FCF45951E65304AEAB1EC24E5BD09@GVW1103EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net> In-Reply-To: <335b9b110806040733y6bb0e77fnab75a519b6f65d47@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080530095616.101712c1.akisada@tahi.org> <00dc01c8c2a3$faa31a30$01000014@fc.bil.konicaminolta.us> <20080604132240.e8c6989d.akisada@tahi.org> <335b9b110806040733y6bb0e77fnab75a519b6f65d47@mail.gmail.com> X-Mail-Count: 00740Hi Arul - SelfTest 4.x.x supports the newer RFCs that are part of the new logo spec=ification.The specific test case you mention is part of RFC 4291 (deprecation of rout=ing header type 0)which is implemented in the latest version of SelfTest. I would assume that= older versions ofFreeBSD (like the one you are using) will not have support for the newer RF=Cs and you mightsee some failures. I would also assume that newer versions of FreeBSD would= support most ofthe RFCs that are part of the Logo major revision update.Sreenath S________________________________From: Arul Murugan [mailto:umarul@gmail.com]Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:04 PMTo: users@tahi.orgSubject: [users:00739] Re: Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-=1/Phase-2 Core ProtocolsHi, Sample test result shows test v6LC.1.2.11(41 Part B: Unrecognized Routin=g Type 0) failed.Is this is execpted or problem with FreeBSD6.1?Regards,ArulOn 6/4/08, Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org<mailto:akisada@tahi.org>> wrote=:Hi, Maria and all.Now, the sample test results of v4.0.1 are available on<http://www.tahi.org/logo/phase2-core/>.These results are for Phase-2.I will prepare Phase-1 results next.Thanks,On Fri, 30 May 2008 15:24:52 -0700"Maria perez" <maria.perez@bil.konicaminolta.us<mailto:maria.perez@bil.koni=caminolta.us>> wrote:> Hi,>> I was wondering if an updated Test Report (of the Self_Test) with the las=t> major version revision changes could be uploaded it would be very helpful> thanks.>> Regards,> Maria>> -----Original Message-----> From: Yukiyo Akisada [mailto:akisada@tahi.org<mailto:akisada@tahi.org>]> Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 5:56 PM> To: users@tahi.org<mailto:users@tahi.org>> Subject: [users:00729] Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program> Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols>> Hi, all.>> Major Version Up for Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols has been accomplished> on IPv6 Ready Logo Program.>> We, TAHI project also followed this update.> Now, Self_Test_4-0-0 and v6eval-3.0.14 have been available on the web.>> When you use Self_Test_4-0-0,> please make sure to use v6eval-3.0.14.>> Here is differences of Self_Test.>> Self_Test_4-0-0: Change Log from 4.0.0b2> ==========================================================================> 2008/05/27 Yukiyo Akisada> M addr.p2/v6LC_3_2_1_[A-C].seq, v6LC_3_2_4_J.seq> - allow time for all devices> to perform stateless address autoconfiguration and> Duplicate Address Detection.>>> 2008/05/21 Yukiyo Akisada> M addr.p2/INDEX_P1_HOST, INDEX_P1_SPECIAL, INDEX_P2_HOST> A addr.p2/v6LC_3_2_4_J.{def,seq}> - add new test (v6LC.3.2.4.J)>>> 2008/05/12 Yukiyo Akisada> M nd.p2/v6LC_2_3_4_[E-H].seq, redirect.pm<http://redirect.pm> (v6=LC.2.3.4)> M nd.p2/redirect.pm<http://redirect.pm> (v6LC.2.3.5, v6LC.2.3.6, =v6LC.2.3.8, v6LC.2.3.9)> - set TR2's NCE to REACHABLE before sending ICMPv6 Redirect>> M nd.p2/redirect.pm<http://redirect.pm> (v6LC.2.3.7)> - set TR2 and TR3's NCE to REACHABLE before sending ICMPv6> Redirect> ==========================================================================>> There is no differences between v6eval-3.0.14 and v6eval-3.0.14b1.>> Thanks,>>> --> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org<mailto:akisada@tahi.org>>>>>>>--Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org<mailto:akisada@tahi.org>>740_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)