<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16640" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=000162617-04062008><FONT face=A=
rial
color=#0000ff size=2>Hi Arul -</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=000162617-04062008><FONT face=A=
rial
color=#0000ff size=2> SelfTest 4.x.x supports the newer RFCs that=
are part
of the new logo specification.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=000162617-04062008><FONT face=A=
rial
color=#0000ff size=2>The specific test case you mention is part of RFC =
4291
(deprecation of routing header type 0)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=000162617-04062008><FONT face=A=
rial
color=#0000ff size=2>which is implemented in the latest version of Self=
Test. I
would assume that older versions of</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=000162617-04062008><FONT face=A=
rial
color=#0000ff size=2>FreeBSD (like the one you are using) will not have=
support
for the newer RFCs and you might</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=000162617-04062008><FONT face=A=
rial
color=#0000ff size=2>see some failures. I would also assume that newer =
versions
of FreeBSD would support most of</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=000162617-04062008><FONT face=A=
rial
color=#0000ff size=2>the RFCs that are part of the Logo major revision=
update.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=000162617-04062008><FONT face=A=
rial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=000162617-04062008><FONT face=A=
rial
color=#0000ff size=2>Sreenath S</FONT></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> Arul Murugan [mailto:umarul@gmail=
.com]
<BR><B>Sent:</B> Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:04 PM<BR><B>To:</B>
users@tahi.org<BR><B>Subject:</B> [users:00739] Re: Major Version Up: IPv6 =
Ready
Logo Program Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Hi,<BR> Sample test result shows=
test
v6LC.1.2.11(41 Part B: Unrecognized Routing Type 0) failed.<BR>Is this is
execpted or problem with FreeBSD6.1?<BR><BR><BR>Regards,<BR>Arul<BR><BR>
<DIV><SPAN class=gmail_quote>On 6/4/08, <B class=gmail_sendername>Yukiy=
o
Akisada</B> <<A href="mailto:akisada@tahi.org">akisada@tahi.org</A>>=
;
wrote:</SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc=
1px solid">Hi,
Maria and all.<BR><BR>Now, the sample test results of v4.0.1 are availabl=
e
on<BR><<A
href="http://www.tahi.org/logo/phase2-core/">http://www.tahi.org/logo/p=
hase2-core/</A>>.<BR><BR>These
results are for Phase-2.<BR>I will prepare Phase-1 results
next.<BR><BR><BR>Thanks,<BR><BR><BR>On Fri, 30 May 2008 15:24:52
-0700<BR>"Maria perez" <<A
href="mailto:maria.perez@bil.konicaminolta.us">maria.perez@bil.konicami=
nolta.us</A>>
wrote:<BR><BR><BR>> Hi,<BR>><BR>> I was wondering if an updated =
Test
Report (of the Self_Test) with the last<BR>> major version revision ch=
anges
could be uploaded it would be very helpful<BR>> thanks.<BR>><BR>>=
;
Regards,<BR>> Maria<BR>><BR>> -----Original Message-----<BR>>=
From: Yukiyo Akisada [mailto:<A
href="mailto:akisada@tahi.org">akisada@tahi.org</A>]<BR>> Sent: Thur=
sday,
May 29, 2008 5:56 PM<BR>> To: <A
href="mailto:users@tahi.org">users@tahi.org</A><BR>> Subject: [users=
:00729]
Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program<BR>> Phase-1/Phase-2 Core
Protocols<BR>><BR>> Hi, all.<BR>><BR>> Major Version Up for
Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols has been accomplished<BR>> on IPv6 Read=
y
Logo Program.<BR>><BR>> We, TAHI project also followed this
update.<BR>> Now, Self_Test_4-0-0 and v6eval-3.0.14 have been availabl=
e on
the web.<BR>><BR>> When you use Self_Test_4-0-0,<BR>> please mak=
e
sure to use v6eval-3.0.14.<BR>><BR>> Here is differences of
Self_Test.<BR>><BR>> Self_Test_4-0-0: Chang=
e Log
from 4.0.0b2<BR>>
=========================
==========================
=======================<BR>&g=
t;
2008/05/27 Yukiyo
Akisada<BR>> M
addr.p2/v6LC_3_2_1_[A-C].seq,
v6LC_3_2_4_J.seq<BR>> &=
nbsp;
- allow time for all
devices<BR>> &nbs=
p;
to perform stateless address autoconfiguration
and<BR>> &n=
bsp;
Duplicate Address Detection.<BR>><BR>><BR>> &nb=
sp;
2008/05/21 Yukiyo
Akisada<BR>> M
addr.p2/INDEX_P1_HOST, INDEX_P1_SPECIAL,
INDEX_P2_HOST<BR>> A
addr.p2/v6LC_3_2_4_J.{def,seq}<BR>>  =;
- add new test (v6LC.3.2.4.J)<BR>><BR>><BR>> &n=
bsp;
2008/05/12 Yukiyo
Akisada<BR>> M
nd.p2/v6LC_2_3_4_[E-H].seq, <A href="http://redirect.pm">redirect.pm</A=
>
(v6LC.2.3.4)<BR>> M
nd.p2/<A href="http://redirect.pm">redirect.pm</A> (v6LC.2.3.5, v6LC.2.=
3.6,
v6LC.2.3.8,
v6LC.2.3.9)<BR>> =
- set TR2's NCE to REACHABLE before sending ICMPv6
Redirect<BR>><BR>> =
M
nd.p2/<A href="http://redirect.pm">redirect.pm</A>
(v6LC.2.3.7)<BR>>  =
;
- set TR2 and TR3's NCE to REACHABLE before sending ICMPv6<BR>>
Redirect<BR>>
=========================
==========================
=======================<BR>&g=
t;<BR>>
There is no differences between v6eval-3.0.14 and
v6eval-3.0.14b1.<BR>><BR>> Thanks,<BR>><BR>><BR>> --<BR>&g=
t;
Yukiyo Akisada <<A
href="mailto:akisada@tahi.org">akisada@tahi.org</A>><BR>><BR>>=
<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR><BR><BR>--<BR>Yukiyo
Akisada <<A
href="mailto:akisada@tahi.org">akisada@tahi.org</A>><BR><BR></BLOCKQUO=
TE></DIV><BR></BODY></HTML>