Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 17:07:30 +0900
From: "K.Kawaguchi" <kawaguti@ysknet.co.jp>
Subject: [users:00744] Re: MIPv6 Conformance Test Suite CN-1-1
To: users@tahi.org, tammy_leino@mentor.com
Message-Id: <200806051707.HJE65150.BLJVBUHX@ysknet.co.jp>
In-Reply-To: <2F83EB16CD718C43889CBCD31ECFD7F8753E3D@na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com>
References: <2F83EB16CD718C43889CBCD31ECFD7F8753E37@na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com>	<2F83EB16CD718C43889CBCD31ECFD7F8753E3D@na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00744

Hello,

It seems that there is a some difference compared with BE
message which the tester expected so that you may guess.

Please see log of the test result in a test tool. A difference
may be able to be found in the part which shows outputted BE
packet with logic structure.
Please send log file to me, if the view of log is not known.


Best Regards
--
Kiyoaki Kawaguchi



""Leino, Tammy" <tammy_leino@mentor.com>" wrote:

> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> 
> 
> Hello,
>  
> I am executing the correspondent node test #1; CN-1-1.  I have IPsec 
disabled.  My tn.def, nut.def and config.txt files are configured properly.  
When TN sends the echo request with a Home Address option (action #3 in the 
test procedure), my NUT responds with a BE message matching the three criteria
 outlined in the JUDGEMENT for *2 of the test:
>  
> (*2) MN receives Binding Error.
>   - The Destination Address is set to the Source Address of ICMP Echo 
Request (MN care-of address).
>   - The Status field is set to 1.
>   - The Home Address field is set to the value in the Home Address option in
 the ICMP Echo Request (MN home address).
>  
> However, TAHI reports the following error and aborts the test:
>  
> CNT_SendAndRecv Status =UnKnown
> UnKnown Pkt=>HASH(0x82b75c8)
> BE - Receive Unexpented Packet
> -> FAIL
>  
> I cannot tell what is wrong with my BE message.  I viewed it in Wireshark, 
and it is formed properly.  Wireshark is able to parse it and recognizes it as
 a BE, and I verified that all the requirements of JUDGEMENT *2 are met.
>  
> Can anyone shed light on this error?  Perhaps a checksum error?  This same 
error occurs for all tests that require a BE to be transmitted to the TN.
>  
> Thank you for any assistance you can lend.
>  
> Best Regards,
> Tammy Leino
>  
> 
> 
> 
>