Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 10:13:56 -0600
From: "Leino, Tammy" <tammy_leino@mentor.com>
Subject: [users:00748] Re: MIPv6 Conformance Test Suite CN-1-1
To: "K.Kawaguchi" <kawaguti@ysknet.co.jp>, <users@tahi.org>
Message-Id: <2F83EB16CD718C43889CBCD31ECFD7F8753E49@na2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com>
In-Reply-To: <200806051707.HJE65150.BLJVBUHX@ysknet.co.jp>
X-Mail-Count: 00748

Hello Kiyoaki,I greatly appreciate your advice and offer to lend assistance.  I havescrutinized the log and output, but I cannot find any error in my BEpacket.I have attached the output results of the first test in CN-1-1.  Pleaserefer to the BE packet that is being rejected.Thank you again for your offer to assist.Best Regards,Tammy Leino-----Original Message-----From: K.Kawaguchi [mailto:kawaguti@ysknet.co.jp]Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 4:08 AMTo: users@tahi.org; Leino, TammySubject: Re: [users:00742] MIPv6 Conformance Test Suite CN-1-1Hello,It seems that there is a some difference compared with BEmessage which the tester expected so that you may guess.Please see log of the test result in a test tool. A differencemay be able to be found in the part which shows outputted BEpacket with logic structure.Please send log file to me, if the view of log is not known.Best Regards--Kiyoaki Kawaguchi""Leino, Tammy" <tammy_leino@mentor.com>" wrote:> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.> > > Hello,>  > I am executing the correspondent node test #1; CN-1-1.  I have IPsec disabled.  My tn.def, nut.def and config.txt files are configuredproperly.  When TN sends the echo request with a Home Address option (action #3 inthe test procedure), my NUT responds with a BE message matching the threecriteria outlined in the JUDGEMENT for *2 of the test:>  > (*2) MN receives Binding Error.>   - The Destination Address is set to the Source Address of ICMP Echo Request (MN care-of address).>   - The Status field is set to 1.>   - The Home Address field is set to the value in the Home Addressoption in the ICMP Echo Request (MN home address).>  > However, TAHI reports the following error and aborts the test:>  > CNT_SendAndRecv Status =UnKnown> UnKnown Pkt=>HASH(0x82b75c8)> BE - Receive Unexpented Packet> -> FAIL>  > I cannot tell what is wrong with my BE message.  I viewed it inWireshark, and it is formed properly.  Wireshark is able to parse it and recognizesit as a BE, and I verified that all the requirements of JUDGEMENT *2 are met.>  > Can anyone shed light on this error?  Perhaps a checksum error?  Thissame error occurs for all tests that require a BE to be transmitted to theTN.>  > Thank you for any assistance you can lend.>  > Best Regards,> Tammy Leino>  > > > > 
748_2.gz