Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:57:42 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00757] Re: Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols
To: sreenath.s@hp.com
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080610105742.bd85a52d.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <E230C7241C9FCF45951E65304AEAB1EC24E5BD0D@GVW1103EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <20080530095616.101712c1.akisada@tahi.org>	<00dc01c8c2a3$faa31a30$01000014@fc.bil.konicaminolta.us>	<20080604132240.e8c6989d.akisada@tahi.org>	<335b9b110806040733y6bb0e77fnab75a519b6f65d47@mail.gmail.com>	<E230C7241C9FCF45951E65304AEAB1EC24E5BD09@GVW1103EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>	<E230C7241C9FCF45951E65304AEAB1EC24E5BD0D@GVW1103EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
X-Mail-Count: 00757

Thanks Sreenath for your explanation.

You are right.

My environment is old.
FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE doesn't support RFC 5095.

Thanks,


On Wed, 4 Jun 2008 17:59:48 +0000
"S, Sreenath" <sreenath.s@hp.com> wrote:

> Corrections:
> 1. It's RFC 5095 NOT 4291
> 2. [Last line]: Major version update NOT major revision update.
> 
> Sreenath S
> 
> ________________________________
> From: S, Sreenath
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 11:02 PM
> To: users@tahi.org
> Subject: [users:00740] Re: Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols
> 
> Hi Arul -
>   SelfTest 4.x.x supports the newer RFCs that are part of the new logo specification.
> The specific test case you mention is part of RFC 4291 (deprecation of routing header type 0)
> which is implemented in the latest version of SelfTest. I would assume that older versions of
> FreeBSD (like the one you are using) will not have support for the newer RFCs and you might
> see some failures. I would also assume that newer versions of FreeBSD would support most of
> the RFCs that are part of the Logo major revision update.
> 
> Sreenath S
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Arul Murugan [mailto:umarul@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 8:04 PM
> To: users@tahi.org
> Subject: [users:00739] Re: Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols
> 
> Hi,
>    Sample test result shows test v6LC.1.2.11(41 Part B: Unrecognized Routing Type 0) failed.
> Is this is execpted or problem with FreeBSD6.1?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Arul
> 
> On 6/4/08, Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org<mailto:akisada@tahi.org>> wrote:
> Hi, Maria and all.
> 
> Now, the sample test results of v4.0.1 are available on
> <http://www.tahi.org/logo/phase2-core/>.
> 
> These results are for Phase-2.
> I will prepare Phase-1 results next.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 
> On Fri, 30 May 2008 15:24:52 -0700
> "Maria perez" <maria.perez@bil.konicaminolta.us<mailto:maria.perez@bil.konicaminolta.us>> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering if an updated Test Report (of the Self_Test) with the last
> > major version revision changes could be uploaded it would be very helpful
> > thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Maria
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yukiyo Akisada [mailto:akisada@tahi.org<mailto:akisada@tahi.org>]
> > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2008 5:56 PM
> > To: users@tahi.org<mailto:users@tahi.org>
> > Subject: [users:00729] Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program
> > Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols
> >
> > Hi, all.
> >
> > Major Version Up for Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols has been accomplished
> > on IPv6 Ready Logo Program.
> >
> > We, TAHI project also followed this update.
> > Now, Self_Test_4-0-0 and v6eval-3.0.14 have been available on the web.
> >
> > When you use Self_Test_4-0-0,
> > please make sure to use v6eval-3.0.14.
> >
> > Here is differences of Self_Test.
> >
> >     Self_Test_4-0-0: Change Log from 4.0.0b2
> >     ========================================================================
> >     2008/05/27      Yukiyo Akisada
> >         M addr.p2/v6LC_3_2_1_[A-C].seq, v6LC_3_2_4_J.seq
> >             - allow time for all devices
> >               to perform stateless address autoconfiguration and
> >               Duplicate Address Detection.
> >
> >
> >     2008/05/21      Yukiyo Akisada
> >         M addr.p2/INDEX_P1_HOST, INDEX_P1_SPECIAL, INDEX_P2_HOST
> >         A addr.p2/v6LC_3_2_4_J.{def,seq}
> >             - add new test (v6LC.3.2.4.J)
> >
> >
> >     2008/05/12      Yukiyo Akisada
> >         M nd.p2/v6LC_2_3_4_[E-H].seq, redirect.pm<http://redirect.pm> (v6LC.2.3.4)
> >         M nd.p2/redirect.pm<http://redirect.pm> (v6LC.2.3.5, v6LC.2.3.6, v6LC.2.3.8, v6LC.2.3.9)
> >             - set TR2's NCE to REACHABLE before sending ICMPv6 Redirect
> >
> >         M nd.p2/redirect.pm<http://redirect.pm> (v6LC.2.3.7)
> >             - set TR2 and TR3's NCE to REACHABLE before sending ICMPv6
> > Redirect
> >     ========================================================================
> >
> > There is no differences between v6eval-3.0.14 and v6eval-3.0.14b1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > --
> > Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org<mailto:akisada@tahi.org>>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org<mailto:akisada@tahi.org>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>