Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:11:39 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00774] Re: Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols
To: tabe@miraclelinux.com
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080617161139.841688d6.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <485760E3.8090201@miraclelinux.com>
References: <20080530095616.101712c1.akisada@tahi.org>	<4843573E.6080208@miraclelinux.com>	<20080610105402.b0eb6466.akisada@tahi.org>	<20080612121300.GB25632@pingi.kke.suse.de>	<4851CBA4.6010308@miraclelinux.com>	<20080613114641.1fa121e3.akisada@tahi.org>	<485760E3.8090201@miraclelinux.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00774

Hi, Abe-san.

Yes, I got Karsten's log.
And please send also your log.

Actually,
Karsten got FAIL at #219-#222.
It seems that it is difference from your situation.

I didn't investigate everything,
but I'm still feeling that the test tool is correct
as I said in the previous E-mail.

Now, I just want to know the behavior.

In my memory,
Linux could get PASS in the past release, right?

Thanks,


On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 15:59:47 +0900
Toyo Abe <tabe@miraclelinux.com> wrote:

> Hello Akisada-san,
> 
> Did you get a log from Karsten?
> Anyway, I can also provide my log if you want.
> 
> Regards,
> -toyo
> 
> Yukiyo Akisada wrote:
> > Hi, Abe-san.
> > 
> > OK,
> > I will investigate it after I receive the log from Karsten.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:21:40 +0900
> > Toyo Abe <tabe@miraclelinux.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> Karsten Keil wrote:
> >>> Hmm, this seems not to be the case, I did run these test with Linux as NUT
> >>> and Test v6LC.2.3.13 Part B-E are skipped because of "initialization fail"
> >>> I can send you logs if you want.
> >>>
> >> Yes, the same thing was happened with not only v6LC.2.3.13 but also 2.3.14 on my environment.
> >> I think it's because NCE in HUT is not killed by the cleanup procedure of previous test.
> >> which I mentioned here.


-- 
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>