Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:44:58 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00775] Re: Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols
To: kkeil@suse.de
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080617164458.7db4a92b.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080613055633.GA6462@pingi.kke.suse.de>
References: <20080530095616.101712c1.akisada@tahi.org>	<4843573E.6080208@miraclelinux.com>	<20080610105402.b0eb6466.akisada@tahi.org>	<20080612121300.GB25632@pingi.kke.suse.de>	<20080613083632.fa858165.akisada@tahi.org>	<20080613055633.GA6462@pingi.kke.suse.de>
X-Mail-Count: 00775

Hi, Karsten.

In Test v6LC.2.3.13,
your box changed your Neighbor Cache State for TR1 to REACHABLE
by receiving Redirect from TR1 as you said.

But, now I have doubt about Test v6LC.2.3.14.
In this test, you got PASS.
Why your box didn't change to REACHABLE by the Redirect?

I think that the situation for TR1 is similar
between v6LC.2.3.13 and v6LC.2.3.14.

For the reference,
I attached expected state machine.

Thanks,


On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:56:34 +0200
Karsten Keil <kkeil@suse.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 08:36:32AM +0900, Yukiyo Akisada wrote:
> > Hi, Karsten
> > 
> > > Hmm, this seems not to be the case, I did run these test with Linux as NUT
> > > and Test v6LC.2.3.13 Part B-E are skipped because of "initialization fail"
> > > I can send you logs if you want.
> > 
> > Of course, I want to see the log.
> > 
> 
> I attach the nd.p2 dir as private mail because of size, feel free to post
> anything from the logs on the list.
> 
> -- 
> Karsten Keil
> SuSE Labs
> ISDN and VOIP development
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr.5 90409 Nuernberg, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg)
> 


-- 
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>

	
775_2.txt (attatchment)(tag is disabled)