Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 17:56:56 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00792] Re: Major Version Up: IPv6 Ready Logo Program Phase-1/Phase-2 Core Protocols
To: tabe@miraclelinux.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kkeil@suse.de
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20080625175656.fce4a8aa.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <4861E19C.4010700@miraclelinux.com>
References: <20080613055633.GA6462@pingi.kke.suse.de>	<20080617164458.7db4a92b.akisada@tahi.org>	<4858CB53.2030402@miraclelinux.com>	<20080625.135237.112045439.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>	<4861E19C.4010700@miraclelinux.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00792

Hi, Abe-san and all.

You may know that I haven't receive the contrary comment about it
in IETF in this moment.

I will change clean up procedure to get in the flexibility of ND.

Thanks,


On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:11:40 +0900
Toyo Abe <tabe@miraclelinux.com> wrote:

> YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> > 
> > Sounds reasonable to me. :-)
> > 
> > We are optimistic in DELAY/REACHABLE phase because the router is much more
> > likely connected.
> > On the other hand, PROBE means we did not get such confirmation in "DELAY"
> > phase, so we just wait for real NA for sure.
> > 
> Oh, I see. Thanks for your explanation.
> BTW, Akisada-san is now asking at IETF ML. We'll get a feedback from him later.
> 
> Regards,
> -toyo
> 
> 


-- 
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>