Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:09:24 +0800
From: Yang Ren <ryang@redhat.com>
Subject: [users:00831] DHCPv6_Self_test_P2_1_0_10 Test case Problem
To: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <1217488164.13357.30.camel@excalibur>
X-Mail-Count: 00831

Hi all,

   I'm running DHCPv6_Self_test. When I run it in server mode it always
returns two failures:
RFC3646 -> 4 -> Part A :Returning of DNS Recursive Name Server option
RFC3736 -> 19 -> Part A :Returning of DNS Recursive Name Server option

The reasons both are 
"Opt_DHCPv6_DNS_SearchList found 
 NG: The unexpected option is exist"

Both test cases send request message with optioncode(23,24)
I think the Reply should contain Opt_DHCPv6_DNS_SearchList(option 24).

But the test case shows:
# check Options
if (0 != options_exist(\%rep2, ($CMP_DNS_SVR))){
        dhcpExitError("<B>The expected option is not exist</B><BR>");
}
if (0 == options_exist(\%rep2, ($CMP_DNS_LST))){
        dhcpExitError("<B>The unexpected option is exist</B><BR>");
}
Rather than "if (0 == options ... The unexpected option is exist",
should it be "if (0 != options ... Opt_DHCPv6_DNS_SearchList does not
exist"?

I didn't see any part which tell me in some case a server should
 reply a message without Opt_DHCPv6_DNS_SearchList if get a request with
optioncode 24 in rfc

Could someone please provide more with regards to this? 

Thanks
Yang Ren