Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:37:53 +0900
From: Toyo Abe <tabe@miraclelinux.com>
Subject: [users:00890] Re: help unstand failure
To: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <48C91121.1050205@miraclelinux.com>
In-Reply-To: <48C6B2F4.2090707@redhat.com>
References: <48A90271.80506@redhat.com> <A8D19528FBF27C4691BD90C81EB22ABE04EBD748@rdlnexch03.marvell.com> <48A923D4.50603@redhat.com> <20080818100436.GA712@pingi.kke.suse.de> <48AA27C3.5000107@miraclelinux.com> <48C6B2F4.2090707@redhat.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00890

wang_jiabo wrote:
> when we finish the fix,
> I  put the "sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.<iface>.accept_dad=2 "to /etc/rc.local
> but still test failure
> could you give me more suggest
> Thanks
> 

No change? Which tests are failed?
AFAIK, the following tests would be passed w/ the fix.

    Test v6LC.3.1.2: Receiving DAD Neighbor Solicitations and Advertisements
    åà€#3 Part B: NUT receives DAD NS (target == NUT)
    åà€#5 Part D: NUT receives DAD NA (target == NUT)

    Test v6LC.3.1.3: Validation of DAD Neighbor Solicitations
    åà€#14 Part I: NUT receives valid DAD NS (Reserved Field)
    åà€#15 Part J: NUT receives valid DAD NS (contains TLL)

    Test v6LC.3.1.4: Validation of DAD Neighbor Advertisements
åà€    #23 Part H: NUT receives valid DAD NA (Reserved Field)
åà€    #24 Part I: NUT receives valid DAD NA (contains SLL)

If these tests are still failed, it might be a timing problem.
Setting this variable via rc.local sounds sightly later than expected.
The result might change by using sysctl.conf instead, like this;
  net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_dad=2


Regards,
-toyo