Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:55:04 +0800
From: wang_jiabo <jiabwang@redhat.com>
Subject: [users:00892] Re: help unstand failure
To: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <48C94D67.1030509@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <48C91121.1050205@miraclelinux.com>
References: <48A90271.80506@redhat.com> <A8D19528FBF27C4691BD90C81EB22ABE04EBD748@rdlnexch03.marvell.com> <48A923D4.50603@redhat.com> <20080818100436.GA712@pingi.kke.suse.de> <48AA27C3.5000107@miraclelinux.com> <48C6B2F4.2090707@redhat.com> <48C91121.1050205@miraclelinux.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00892

Toyo Abe wrote:
> wang_jiabo wrote:
>> when we finish the fix,
>> I  put the "sysctl -w net.ipv6.conf.<iface>.accept_dad=2 "to 
>> /etc/rc.local
>> but still test failure
>> could you give me more suggest
>> Thanks
>>
>
> No change? Which tests are failed?
> AFAIK, the following tests would be passed w/ the fix.
>
>    Test v6LC.3.1.2: Receiving DAD Neighbor Solicitations and 
> Advertisements
>    åà€#3 Part B: NUT receives DAD NS (target == NUT)
>    åà€#5 Part D: NUT receives DAD NA (target == NUT)
>
>    Test v6LC.3.1.3: Validation of DAD Neighbor Solicitations
>    åà€#14 Part I: NUT receives valid DAD NS (Reserved Field)
>    åà€#15 Part J: NUT receives valid DAD NS (contains TLL)
>
>    Test v6LC.3.1.4: Validation of DAD Neighbor Advertisements
> åà€    #23 Part H: NUT receives valid DAD NA (Reserved Field)
> åà€    #24 Part I: NUT receives valid DAD NA (contains SLL)
>
> If these tests are still failed, it might be a timing problem.
> Setting this variable via rc.local sounds sightly later than expected.
> The result might change by using sysctl.conf instead, like this;
>  net.ipv6.conf.default.accept_dad=2
>
>
> Regards,
> -toyo
>   
I do not know how to sync system time and software time in the Freebsd, 
I use ntpd, but no good,