William Seppeler wrote:
> In this test, the TN sends an (un)soliticted NA with the S bit set with
> the expectation that the NUT will update it's NCE. However, based on
> RFC4861:
>
> S Solicited flag. When set, the S-bit indicates that
> the advertisement was sent in response to a
> Neighbor Solicitation from the Destination address.
> The S-bit is used as a reachability confirmation
> for Neighbor Unreachability Detection. It MUST NOT
> be set in multicast advertisements or in
> unsolicited unicast advertisements.
>
> So my thoughts are the TN sends a packet that violates the spec (ie: MUST
> NOT). Can someone explain to me why the table shown in the test
> description expects the NUT to update it's NCE. It would seem that the
> RFC expects such a packet should get ignored.
>
> Thank you,
>
> ========================================
> William Seppeler
> Test Engineer
> Performance Technologies Inc.
> 205 Indigo Creek Dr.
> Rochester, NY 14626
>
> Phone: (585) 256-0200, Fax: (585) 256-0791
> Email: wrs@pt.com, Web: www.pt.com
> ========================================
>
>
Hello, William:
do you test OS for host? if you test OS for host, I think you should
check your tn.def configuration,
the MAC address do need change for tn.def. that is mean, MAC address
should not be real MAC address for tn.def
Wang Jiabo