Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:38:36 +0900
From: Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [users:00910] Re: Request for Linux version 2.6.20 test results
To: users@tahi.org
Cc: William Seppeler <wrs@pt.com>
Message-Id: <20081002133836.9f7d3e2a.mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF5756470C.1952DFF7-ON852574D5.0042DC2E-852574D5.00451F2F@pt.com>
References: <OF5756470C.1952DFF7-ON852574D5.0042DC2E-852574D5.00451F2F@pt.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00910

On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:34:58 -0400
William Seppeler <wrs@pt.com> wrote:

> Is there an official group that hosts TAHI conformance test results for 
> stock Linux kernels?
> 
> I'm testing a product based on Linux kernel 2.6.20 and some failures 
> appear to be Linux kernel related.
> 
> In particular, I'm looking for Linux 2.6.20 test results for:
> 
> Self_Test_4-0-2 (host and router) (phase1 and phase2)
> DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2_1_0_12 (client, server, and relay)
> DNS_Self_Test_1-1-1 (client)
> 
> and if possible, results for:
> 
> ct-2.1.1 (only interested in sections not covered above)
> 
> PS:  I see the Linux obtained IPv6Ready Logo status, however it appears 
> the Logo was attained using an old(er) Self_Test version.  Does anyone 
> know if Linux passes the latest Self_Test suite?

As I don't have the results on kernel-2.6.20, I'd like to
reply the question in PS.
There are 7 failures at new test items. 6 failures in addr.p2
and 1 failure in icmp.p2 with even the latest 2.6.26 kernel.
The patch for those are in upcoming 2.6.27.
ref. http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg67726.html

Best Regards,
----
Mitsuru Chinen <mitch@linux.vnet.ibm.com>