Hello,
May I also add comment to the expected behavior in this part of the
self-test script.
I hope that the script will not be very strict in the checking of
dhcpv6 options that it received because in our case, our dhcpv6 server
always provide a dns recursive server option to dhcpv6 clients.
Thanks,
Rommel
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:43 PM, <Nobumichi.Ozoe@jp.yokogawa.com> wrote:
> Hi Yang,
>
> These test purpose are to verify the DHCP server transmits a message with correctly configured DNS option.
>
> Then, you need to change server's configuration.
>
> Part A. DHCP server is configured to provide only DNS Recursive Name Server option in parallel with address assignment.
> Part B. DHCP server is configured to provde DNS Recursive Name Server option and DNS Domain Search List option in paralled with address assignment.
>
> Best regards,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yang Ren [mailto:ryang@redhat.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:04 PM
>> To: users@tahi.org
>> Subject: [users:00933] Get Confused about DHCPv6 test case
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> That there is one point in dhcpv6 test case confused me
>> for a long time.
>>
>> For rfc3646
>> 4 Part A: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option.
>> 5 Part B: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option and
>> Domain Search List Option.
>>
>> The two test cases send the same Solicit message.
>>
>> which in my test environment is
>> Solicit Message
>> DHCPv6 Option
>> Values
>> Opt_DHCPv6_OptionRequest
>> OptionCode = 23 OPTION_DNS_SERVERS
>> OptionCode = 24 OPTION_DOMAIN_LIST
>> Identifier
>> Identifier = 100
>> Opt_DHCPv6_CID
>> DUID-LLT HardwareType = 1
>> DUID-LLT MAC = 00:00:00:00:a2:a2
>> DUID-LLT TIME = 300000
>> Opt_DHCPv6_ElapsedTime
>> Time = 0
>> Opt_DHCPv6_IA_NA
>> Option 1
>> Identifier= 101010
>> T1= 50
>> T2= 80
>>
>>
>> But what they expect is different.
>> part A need a advertise message with only Name server Part B
>> need a advertise message with both name server and search list.
>>
>> I think it's impossible to let a server reply two different
>> advertise message to a same solicit message.These two cases
>> can not been passed in one time.
>>
>> Whatever I do. There is only one test case can pass.
>>
>> This also happen in
>> rfc3736
>>
>> 19 Part A: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option 20
>> Part B: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option and
>> Domain Search List Option
>>
>>
>> Is there someone can turn on the light for me. Thanks :)
>> --
>> Yang Ren
>>
>>
>>
>
>