Hi Nobumichi,
Thank you very much :)
In your opinion, do I need two configure file? And while running the
dhcpv6 test case I should use use different configure file?
You know if DHCP server is configured to provide only Name Server
option there are several test case about Search list will fail.
if DHCP server is configured to provide both there are two test case
which only need Name server will fail.
Thanks
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 18:43 +0900, Nobumichi.Ozoe@jp.yokogawa.com wrote:
> Hi Yang,
>
> These test purpose are to verify the DHCP server transmits a message with correctly configured DNS option.
>
> Then, you need to change server's configuration.
>
> Part A. DHCP server is configured to provide only DNS Recursive Name Server option in parallel with address assignment.
> Part B. DHCP server is configured to provde DNS Recursive Name Server option and DNS Domain Search List option in paralled with address assignment.
>
> Best regards,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yang Ren [mailto:ryang@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:04 PM
> > To: users@tahi.org
> > Subject: [users:00933] Get Confused about DHCPv6 test case
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > That there is one point in dhcpv6 test case confused me
> > for a long time.
> >
> > For rfc3646
> > 4 Part A: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option.
> > 5 Part B: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option and
> > Domain Search List Option.
> >
> > The two test cases send the same Solicit message.
> >
> > which in my test environment is
> > Solicit Message
> > DHCPv6 Option
> > Values
> > Opt_DHCPv6_OptionRequest
> > OptionCode = 23 OPTION_DNS_SERVERS
> > OptionCode = 24 OPTION_DOMAIN_LIST
> > Identifier
> > Identifier = 100
> > Opt_DHCPv6_CID
> > DUID-LLT HardwareType = 1
> > DUID-LLT MAC = 00:00:00:00:a2:a2
> > DUID-LLT TIME = 300000
> > Opt_DHCPv6_ElapsedTime
> > Time = 0
> > Opt_DHCPv6_IA_NA
> > Option 1
> > Identifier= 101010
> > T1= 50
> > T2= 80
> >
> >
> > But what they expect is different.
> > part A need a advertise message with only Name server Part B
> > need a advertise message with both name server and search list.
> >
> > I think it's impossible to let a server reply two different
> > advertise message to a same solicit message.These two cases
> > can not been passed in one time.
> >
> > Whatever I do. There is only one test case can pass.
> >
> > This also happen in
> > rfc3736
> >
> > 19 Part A: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option 20
> > Part B: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option and
> > Domain Search List Option
> >
> >
> > Is there someone can turn on the light for me. Thanks :)
> > --
> > Yang Ren
> >
> >
> >
--
Yang Ren