Hi Rommel,
TAHI dhcpv6 test tool is following the IPv6 Ready Logo Phase-2 test specification.
Do you have a question about DHCPv6 test specification?
If so, it is better for you to ask ipv6ready-info@ipv6ready.org.
Best regards,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rommel Laranjo [mailto:rslaranjo@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 8:06 PM
> To: users@tahi.org
> Subject: [users:00936] Re: Get Confused about DHCPv6 test case
>
> Hello,
>
> May I also add comment to the expected behavior in this part
> of the self-test script.
>
> I hope that the script will not be very strict in the checking of
> dhcpv6 options that it received because in our case, our
> dhcpv6 server always provide a dns recursive server option to
> dhcpv6 clients.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Rommel
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:43 PM,
> <Nobumichi.Ozoe@jp.yokogawa.com> wrote:
> > Hi Yang,
> >
> > These test purpose are to verify the DHCP server transmits
> a message with correctly configured DNS option.
> >
> > Then, you need to change server's configuration.
> >
> > Part A. DHCP server is configured to provide only DNS
> Recursive Name Server option in parallel with address assignment.
> > Part B. DHCP server is configured to provde DNS Recursive
> Name Server option and DNS Domain Search List option in
> paralled with address assignment.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Yang Ren [mailto:ryang@redhat.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, October 20, 2008 6:04 PM
> >> To: users@tahi.org
> >> Subject: [users:00933] Get Confused about DHCPv6 test case
> >>
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> That there is one point in dhcpv6 test case confused me
> for a long
> >> time.
> >>
> >> For rfc3646
> >> 4 Part A: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option.
> >> 5 Part B: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option
> and Domain
> >> Search List Option.
> >>
> >> The two test cases send the same Solicit message.
> >>
> >> which in my test environment is
> >> Solicit Message
> >> DHCPv6 Option
> >> Values
> >> Opt_DHCPv6_OptionRequest
> >> OptionCode = 23 OPTION_DNS_SERVERS
> >> OptionCode = 24 OPTION_DOMAIN_LIST
> >> Identifier
> >> Identifier = 100
> >> Opt_DHCPv6_CID
> >> DUID-LLT HardwareType = 1
> >> DUID-LLT MAC = 00:00:00:00:a2:a2
> >> DUID-LLT TIME = 300000
> >> Opt_DHCPv6_ElapsedTime
> >> Time = 0
> >> Opt_DHCPv6_IA_NA
> >> Option 1
> >> Identifier= 101010
> >> T1= 50
> >> T2= 80
> >>
> >>
> >> But what they expect is different.
> >> part A need a advertise message with only Name server Part
> B need a
> >> advertise message with both name server and search list.
> >>
> >> I think it's impossible to let a server reply two
> different advertise
> >> message to a same solicit message.These two cases can not
> been passed
> >> in one time.
> >>
> >> Whatever I do. There is only one test case can pass.
> >>
> >> This also happen in
> >> rfc3736
> >>
> >> 19 Part A: Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option
> 20 Part B:
> >> Returning of DNS Recurisive Name Server option and Domain
> Search List
> >> Option
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there someone can turn on the light for me. Thanks :)
> >> --
> >> Yang Ren
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>