Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 19:22:19 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:00986] Re: PF problem? PF incompatibility?
To: dvillamero_777@yahoo.com
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20081111192219.2d9e34fa.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <626157.17061.qm@web57905.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
References: <47811.70609.qm@web57905.mail.re3.yahoo.com>	<626157.17061.qm@web57905.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
X-Mail-Count: 00986

Hi, Dominic.

What is "PF" in your word?
And what is what is "allow-opts" option?

I have never heard them.

Please let me be clear.


On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 02:12:47 -0800 (PST)
dominic villamero <dvillamero_777@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Oh my :(, segment 39, 40, and 41 under Section 1: RFC 2460 - IPv6 Specification still FAILED. Even setting the "allow-opts" option, if anyone knows something regarding this concern please enlighten us ^_^.
> 
> With "allow-opt" rule, only segment 38 succeeded...
> 
> Hmm...do you think PF is the problem? please help..thanks
> 
> 
> =- dominic  
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 11/7/08, dominic villamero <dvillamero_777@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: dominic villamero <dvillamero_777@yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: [users:00980] PF problem? PF incompatibility?
> > To: dvillamero_777@yahoo.com
> > Cc: users@tahi.org
> > Date: Friday, November 7, 2008, 2:10 PM
> > My work mate already solved the problem. Just added the
> > option "allow-opts"
> > 
> > example: pass all allow-opts
> > 
> > Anyways, thanks 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- On Fri, 11/7/08, dominic villamero
> > <dvillamero_777@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: dominic villamero
> > <dvillamero_777@yahoo.com>
> > > Subject: [users:00980] PF problem? PF incompatibility?
> > > To: users@tahi.org
> > > Date: Friday, November 7, 2008, 4:00 AM
> > > Hello All, Good day!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >      I tried to run the latest version of Self_Test
> > > script on FreeBSD 7-Release against my 
> > > NUT which was also running on FreeBSD 7. As expected,
> > the
> > > test ran perfectly fine and 
> > > resulted a 100% passing rate.
> > > 
> > >    To go further with my test I enabled PF in NUT and
> > > configured it to "pass all" entering and
> > exiting
> > > traffic regardless whether if its ipv6 or ipv4.
> > > Unfortunately, there were 4 FAILURES all under
> > "Section
> > > 1: RFC 2460 - Ipv6 Specification" specifically
> > segments
> > > 
> > > "Test v6LC.1.2.9: Unrecognized Routing Type - End
> > > Node" and "Test v6LC.1.2.10: Unrecognized
> > Routing
> > > Type - Intermediate Node" numbers 38, 39, 40 and
> > 41.
> > > 
> > > Test v6LC.1.2.9: Unrecognized Routing Type - End Node
> > >     38: Part A: Unrecognized Routing Type 33     
> > > FAIL
> > >     39: Part B: Unrecognized Routing Type 0       
> > > FAIL
> > > 
> > > Test v6LC.1.2.10: Unrecognized Routing Type -
> > Intermediate
> > > Node
> > >     40: Part A: Unrecognized Routing Type 33     
> > > FAIL
> > >     41: Part B: Unrecognized Routing Type 0       
> > > FAIL
> > > 
> > > So my questions:
> > >        Is there a known issue regarding this?
> > >       Or am I missing something out? :(
> > >       If PF is the problem is there a workaround?
> > > 
> > > I'm just new here, please pardon me if those
> > questions
> > > had already been asked and 
> > > answered before...Again I'm so sorry...and thank
> > you
> > > 
> > > Test info:
> > > 
> > > TN - FreeBSD 7
> > > NUT - FreeBSD 7
> > > Test - phase 2
> > > Type - Host
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Dominic
> 
> 
>       
> 
> 


-- 
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>