Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:36:44 -0700
From: Dwight Tovey <dwight.tovey@hp.com>
Subject: [users:01018] Re: DHCPv6 Self Test V1.0.14 bug
To: "users@tahi.org" <users@tahi.org>
Message-Id: <1228495004.8336.13.camel@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <44C6761D700E0F459CEB255EF80380D80120CA18DF22@EXMAIL01.jp.ykgw.net>
References: <1228417223.13331.21.camel@dwight-laptop.boi.hp.com>	 <44C6761D700E0F459CEB255EF80380D80120CA18DF22@EXMAIL01.jp.ykgw.net>
X-Mail-Count: 01018

html log attached.

That packet name isn't called directly.  

In C_RFC3315_18_1_8_RecvReplyUseNewAddr.seq there is a call to:
  ping_nut_test( $IF0, "server1", "nut", "1" );

That function is defined in DHCPv6_common.pm.  It takes those arguments
and builds the packet name:
  $vSendFrameName = "na_".$EchoName."ga"."_to_".$ReplyName.$AddrNum."ga";

It looks like C_RFC3315_18_1_8_RecvReplyUseNewAddr.seq is the only test
that actually uses that function, but it calls it with two different
sets of parameters (AddrNum == 1 and AddrNum == 2).  So you will
probably have to add back both na_server1ga_to_nut1ga and
na_server1ga_to_nut2ga

	/dwight

On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 02:42 +0000, Nobumichi.Ozoe@jp.yokogawa.com wrote:
> Hi Dwight,
> 
> I recognize that packet define "na_server1ga_to_nut1ga" is not called from any test script.
> Then, I removed it. My apologies for not writing in CHANGELOG.ct.
> 
> Anyway, as you reported that its packet define is used, could you show me the html log file?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dwight Tovey [mailto:dwight.tovey@hp.com]
> > Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 4:00 AM
> > To: users@tahi.org
> > Subject: [users:01014] DHCPv6 Self Test V1.0.14 bug
> >
> > Hello -
> >
> > I believe that a problem has been introduced with the latest
> > release of the DHCPv6 Self Test.  I'm getting a failure with
> > rfc3315/C_RFC3315_18_1_8_RecvReplyUseNewAddr.seq that looks
> > like a packet definition is missing.  The log shows:
> >
> > vSend(Link0,na_server1ga_to_nut1ga)
> > !!! specified na_server1ga_to_nut1ga not found !!!
> > V6evalTool.pm vSend() return status=1
> >
> > While digging through the script and .def files, it looks
> > like the definition for 'na_server1ga_to_nut1ga' (plus
> > others) was removed from DHCPv6.def (it was present in
> > V1.0.13), but the test script is still trying to use it.
> >
> > According to the CHANGELOG, DHCPv6.def was modified on the
> > 2008/10/07 checkin, but it doesn't say why or what was changed.
> >
> > Would somebody from Tahi care to look at this and let us know
> > if those packets were supposed to have been removed?
> >
> > Thanks
> >         /dwight
> >
> > --
> > Dwight Tovey
> > IO Test Engineer
> > email: dwight.tovey@hp.com
> > (208) 396-4645
> >
> >
> >
> 
-- 
Dwight Tovey
IO Test Engineer
email: dwight.tovey@hp.com
(208) 396-4645


	
1018_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)