Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:30:28 +0800
From: "Rommel Laranjo" <rslaranjo@gmail.com>
Subject: [users:01050] Re: Question about IPv6 Ready Phase 2 Interoperability
To: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <f051005f0812170030q53cf0ef1r8b6bbae4215a06e0@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ba28e1060812162131q181d9a78q37aa7402b0cac87e@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f051005f0812161905t3371c3a5w888cc10bd85fcd9b@mail.gmail.com>	 <494873F0.7050408@redhat.com>	 <f051005f0812161949ud67991ch5402979c92a616a6@mail.gmail.com>	 <ba28e1060812162131q181d9a78q37aa7402b0cac87e@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 01050

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 1:31 PM, TCP IP <tcp.ip.ip6@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> Even when i test i got 33% of packet loss., but i think that is worng.
> becuse the n/w topology looks as follows.
>
>                       MC1
>                          |
> ----------+------------+---------------------  N/W1 MTU 1500
>            |
>           MC2
>           |
> ---------+----------------+-------------------- N/W2 MTU 1280
>                            |
>                          MC3
>                           |
> -----+-------------------+----------------------- N/W3 MTU 1500
>      |
>    MC4
>
> In script we ping 3 time from MC4 to MC1 as follows.
> Ping -c 1 -c 1452 MC1 ( 100% packet loss)
> Ping -c 1 -c 1452 MC1 ( 100% packet loss)
> Ping -c 3-c 1452 MC1  ( 33% packet loss)
>
>
> Yes, 1st ping will get too big messge from MC3 and MC4 will reduce its PMTU to 1280.
> and 2nd ping will reach MC1. The MC1 will try to reply with MTU 1500, so it
> also will get Too big message from MC2.( 2packet lost )
>
> Now, MC1 and MC4 knows it PMTU, the last ping has to 0 % packet loss right?
>
> Am i missiing anything here?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 12/17/08, Rommel Laranjo <rslaranjo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thank you so much wang_jiabo for your reply. So now I think there is
>> something wrong with my setup cause I experience huge percentage of packet
>> drop.
>> From my packet sniff on Network1, I've seen several ICMPv6 Echo reply but
>> only few were received by TAR-Router1.
>>
>> Thanks alot,
>>
>> Rommel
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:37 AM, wang_jiabo <jiabwang@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello, Rommel Laranjo:
>>>  my test result for 1.6 part D:
>>>
>>> Rommel Laranjo ping6 -I eth0 -c 3 -s 1500 3ffe:501:ffff:104::1 >
>>> 1.6.D.RedHat.Cisco.result
>>>
>>> PING 3ffe:501:ffff:104::1(3ffe:501:ffff:104::1) from
>>> 3ffe:501:ffff:100:210:18ff:fe32:56e2 eth0: 1500 data bytes
>>> From 3ffe:501:ffff:100::1 icmp_seq=0 Packet too big: mtu=1280
>>> 1508 bytes from 3ffe:501:ffff:104::1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=62 time=2.06 ms
>>> 1508 bytes from 3ffe:501:ffff:104::1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=62 time=2.13 ms
>>>
>>> --- 3ffe:501:ffff:104::1 ping statistics ---
>>> 3 packets transmitted, 2 received, +1 errors, 33% packet loss, time
>>> 2000ms
>>> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 2.061/2.100/2.139/0.039 ms, pipe 2
>>>
>>>
>>> [H3CMSR2020]ping ipv6 -s 1500 3ffe:501:ffff:100:210:18ff:fe32:56e2
>>>  PING 3ffe:501:ffff:100:210:18ff:fe32:56e2 : 1500  data bytes, press
>>> CTRL_C to break
>>>   Reply from 3FFE:501:FFFF:100:210:18FF:FE32:56E2
>>>   bytes=1500 Sequence=1 hop limit=62  time = 2 ms
>>>   Reply from 3FFE:501:FFFF:100:210:18FF:FE32:56E2
>>>   bytes=1500 Sequence=2 hop limit=62  time = 2 ms
>>>   Reply from 3FFE:501:FFFF:100:210:18FF:FE32:56E2
>>>   bytes=1500 Sequence=3 hop limit=62  time = 3 ms
>>>   Reply from 3FFE:501:FFFF:100:210:18FF:FE32:56E2
>>>   bytes=1500 Sequence=4 hop limit=62  time = 3 ms
>>>   Reply from 3FFE:501:FFFF:100:210:18FF:FE32:56E2
>>>   bytes=1500 Sequence=5 hop limit=62  time = 3 ms
>>>
>>>  --- 3ffe:501:ffff:100:210:18ff:fe32:56e2 ping statistics ---
>>>   5 packet(s) transmitted
>>>   5 packet(s) received
>>>   0.00% packet loss
>>>   round-trip min/avg/max = 2/2/3 ms
>>>
>>> I hope this can help you.
>>>  jiabo
>>>
>>> Hello to all tahi users,
>>>>
>>>> I know this post is not related to using the TAHI script because I'm
>>>> doing manual IPv6 Interoperability Testing.
>>>> But I just hope someone would be kind enough to share their expert
>>>> knowledge about Interoperability Testing.
>>>>
>>>> I am now performing Test IP6Interop.1.6: Path MTU Discovery and
>>>> Fragmentation Part D steps 23 to 27. My question is this, is it normal to
>>>> see packet loss about 90% or sometimes 80% when I ping from TAR-Router1 to
>>>> TAR-Host1 ? and from TAR-Host1 to TAR-Router1 ?
>>>> If there would be packet loss, how much would be the expected value?
>>>> I gladly appreciate your replies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Rommel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

	

1050_2.html (attatchment)(tag is disabled)