Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:06:59 +0800
From: Yang Ren <ryang@redhat.com>
Subject: [users:01073] Re: StatusCode Option Problem
To: Nobumichi.Ozoe@jp.yokogawa.com
Cc: users@tahi.org, llim@redhat.com
Message-Id: <1232593619.11607.33.camel@excalibur>
In-Reply-To: <44C6761D700E0F459CEB255EF80380D80120CCF58748@EXMAIL01.jp.ykgw.net>
References: <1232526441.11607.29.camel@excalibur>	 <44C6761D700E0F459CEB255EF80380D80120CCF58748@EXMAIL01.jp.ykgw.net>
X-Mail-Count: 01073

Thanks Nobumichi 

I'll run it now. Update here later.


On Thu, 2009-01-22 at 12:00 +0900, Nobumichi.Ozoe@jp.yokogawa.com wrote:
> Hi Yang,
> 
> Sorry, I was wrong checking position of status code option.
> Could you try this test scripte?
> <http://www.tahi.org/~ozoe/DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2_1_0_16/rfc3315/S_RFC3315_22.13_StatusCodeOP.seq>
> 
> If it is fine, I will soon update new test tool version.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Yang Ren [mailto:ryang@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:27 PM
> > To: users@tahi.org
> > Cc: Lawrence Lim
> > Subject: [users:01070] StatusCode Option Problem
> >
> > Hi ALL,
> >
> >     I'm testing DHCP using DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2_1_0_15.
> >     I got a fail in rfc3315 running server test case.
> >     23 Status Code Option Format
> >
> >     I can get it pass in DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2_1_0_13 with the
> > same server behavior.
> >
> > My Reply message is
> > Frame_Ether                     (length:158)
> > | Hdr_Ether                       (length:14)
> > | | DestinationAddress               = 00:00:00:00:a2:a2
> > | | SourceAddress                    = 00:10:18:32:56:e2
> > | | Type                             = 34525
> > | Packet_IPv6                     (length:144)
> > | | Hdr_IPv6                        (length:40)
> > | | | Version                          = 6
> > | | | TrafficClass                     = 0
> > | | | FlowLabel                        = 0
> > | | | PayloadLength                    = 104
> > | | | NextHeader                       = 17
> > | | | HopLimit                         = 64
> > | | | SourceAddress                    = fe80::210:18ff:fe32:56e2
> > | | | DestinationAddress               = fe80::200:ff:fe00:a2a2
> > | | Upp_UDP                         (length:104)
> > | | | Hdr_UDP                         (length:8)
> > | | | | SourcePort                       = 547
> > | | | | DestinationPort                  = 546
> > | | | | Length                           = 104
> > | | | | Checksum                         = 17158 calc(17158)
> > | | | Udp_DHCPv6_Reply                (length:96)
> > | | | | Type                             = 7
> > | | | | Identifier                       = 101
> > | | | | Opt_DHCPv6_CID                  (length:18)
> > | | | | | Code                             = 1
> > | | | | | Length                           = 14
> > | | | | | DHCPv6_DUID_LLT_Ether           (length:14)
> > | | | | | | Type                             = 1
> > | | | | | | HardwareType                     = 1
> > | | | | | | Time                             = 300000
> > | | | | | | LinkLayerAddress                 = 00:00:00:00:a2:a2
> > | | | | Opt_DHCPv6_SID                  (length:18)
> > | | | | | Code                             = 2
> > | | | | | Length                           = 14
> > | | | | | DHCPv6_DUID_LLT_Ether           (length:14)
> > | | | | | | Type                             = 1
> > | | | | | | HardwareType                     = 1
> > | | | | | | Time                             = 300000
> > | | | | | | LinkLayerAddress                 = 02:00:00:00:03:00
> > | | | | Opt_DHCPv6_IA_NA                (length:56)
> > | | | | | Code                             = 3
> > | | | | | Length                           = 52
> > | | | | | Identifier                       = 101010
> > | | | | | Time1                            = 5000
> > | | | | | Time2                            = 16000
> > | | | | | Opt_DHCPv6_IA_Address           (length:34)
> > | | | | | | Code                             = 5
> > | | | | | | Length                           = 30
> > | | | | | | Address                          = 3ffe:503:ffff:100::abcd
> > | | | | | | PreferredLifetime                = 100
> > | | | | | | ValidLifetime                    = 200
> > | | | | | | Opt_DHCPv6_StatusCode           (length:6)
> > | | | | | | | Code                             = 13
> > | | | | | | | Length                           = 2
> > | | | | | | | StatusCode                       = 4
> > | | | | | | | Message                          =
> > | | | | | Opt_DHCPv6_StatusCode           (length:6)
> > | | | | | | Code                             = 13
> > | | | | | | Length                           = 2
> > | | | | | | StatusCode                       = 4
> > | | | | | | Message                          =
> > ===dhcp6_reply=================================
> >
> > It do has a StatusCode 4 NotOnLink
> >
> > But Test suit always return a failed
> >
> > Checking existing option...
> > Opt_DHCPv6_StatusCode not found
> > NG: NUT does not include Status Code option.
> >
> > I checked S_RFC3315_22.13_StatusCodeOP.seq Saw these codes is
> > new, and this code made test case failed.
> >
> > dhcpExitError("<B>NUT does not include Status Code option.</B>")
> >         if options_exist(\%rep4,$CMP_STATUS_CODE);
> >
> > I checked changelog. I find a change.
> > 2008/11/14
> >         Bug fix for Server
> >                 Correct status code value check.
> >                 Some tests always expected to be returned
> > status code Success(0) from
> >                 Server after message exchange. However the
> > Status Code option does not
> >                 appear in a message in which the option could
> > appear, the status of the
> >                 message is assumed to be Success(0). (See
> > also RFC3315 section 22.13)
> >                 Therefore, now test accept without Status
> > Code option with value Success.
> >
> > Does it effect the result? Is this a bug in test suit.
> > Can anyone explain me why this test case failed? And how to
> > change the server behavior if it's a server error or
> > configure problem?
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> >
> > --
> > Yang Ren
> >
> >
> >
-- 
Yang Ren