Hi, Srinidhi.
According to your <115.html.Link0.dump>,
it looks suspiciously like that RUT didn't discard the invalid RS...
19:42:41.200168 :: > ff02::2: icmp6: router solicitation
19:42:41.202224 fe80::2e0:92ff:fe01:18d > ff02::1: icmp6: router advertisement
Could you confirm it?
If it was the periodic one,
could you increase MinRtrAdvInterval and MaxRtrAdvInterval?
Thanks,
On Mon, 25 May 2009 12:27:40 +0530
Srinidhi Gopal <srinidhigopal@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running IPv6 Ready Logo Phase 2 on the target board (Router Box).
>
> All the conformance test cases are passing except *Test Case 115 in Neighbor
> Discovery.* (Ie.,* Test v6LC.2.2.4 *- Router Ignores Invalid Router
> Solicitations (Routers Only) - *Part A: Hop Limit is not 255*)*
> *
> According to the test case, when TN1 transmits a Router Solicitation with an
> IPv6 Hop Limit of 254, the RUT must discard the Router Solicitation from TN1
> and must not transmit* a corresponding Router Advertisement* within
> MAX_RA_DELAY_TIME (0.5) seconds.
>
> As expected, our router doesn't respond with the corresponding RA. But the
> TAHI test script indicates that the test case failed with "*Observe RA*".
> The RA observed is the periodic one being sent by TR1 to all-node-multicast
> address and not the RA sent in response to the RS from TN1.
>
> Have attached the required report (115.html) along with the packet dumps.
>
> Kindly help me in resolving this issue.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Srinidhi Gopal
>
--
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>