Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:00:59 +0900
From: Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:01251] Re: ct-2.1.1
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicodichtel@gmail.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20090713100059.6a2a732f.akisada@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <5e89445b0907090127o7a7a54baqb61282a72c849352@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5e89445b0907090127o7a7a54baqb61282a72c849352@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mail-Count: 01251

Hi, Nicolas.

Now, ct-2.1.1 has not been maintained anymore as you said.

ct-2.1.1 had supported several protocols,
but now some of those protocols are supported by other testers like as Self_Test_XXX.

But other protocols are supported still only by ct-2.1.1.
That is why we keep ct-2.1.1 even now.

The following list is contents of ct-2.1.1,
and I added the current situation for each protocols.
Please refer to it.

  - IPv6 Specification
  - ICMPv6 for IPv6 Specification
  - Neighbor Discovery
  - IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration
  - IPv6 Path MTU Discovery

      => These 5 protocols are supported by "Self_Test" package.

  - IPSec AH and ESP for IPv6
  - IPSec ESP for IPv6(UDP)

      => These 2 protocols are supported by "IPsec_Self_Test_P2" package,
         but we stopped to support AH anymore.

  - Mobility Support in IPv6 (ID-20) - Correspondent Node
  - Mobility Support in IPv6 (ID-20) - Home Agent
  - Mobility Support in IPv6 (ID-20) - Mobile Node

      => These 3 protocols are supported by "ct-mipv6-xxx" packages.

  - Prefix delegation

      => This protocol will be supported by
         upcoming version of "DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2" packages.

  - IPSec AH and ESP for IPv4
  - IPSec AH and ESP for IPv4(UDP)
  - Default Router Preferences, More-Specific Routes, and Load Sharing
  - Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)
  - DNS discovery
  - IPv6 over IPv4 Tunnel
  - NAT-PT
  - Robustness

      => These 8 protocols are only in "ct-2.1.1".

Thanks,


On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:27:31 +0200
Nicolas Dichtel <nicodichtel@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> on the web site (http://www.tahi.org/release/), ct-2.1.1 is always
> referenced, but we know that this test_suite is not supported since a
> long time.
> In fact, with the latest test_tools (REL_3_1_0) there is many internal errors.
> 
> Is there a good reason to keep a link to these tests?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Nicolas
> 
> 


-- 
Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>