Hi Yukiyo,
thank you for your answers. Please see my comments inline.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 3:00 AM, Yukiyo Akisada<akisada@tahi.org> wrote:
> Hi, Nicolas.
>
> Now, ct-2.1.1 has not been maintained anymore as you said.
>
> ct-2.1.1 had supported several protocols,
> but now some of those protocols are supported by other testers like as Self_Test_XXX.
>
> But other protocols are supported still only by ct-2.1.1.
> That is why we keep ct-2.1.1 even now.
>
> The following list is contents of ct-2.1.1,
> and I added the current situation for each protocols.
> Please refer to it.
>
> - IPv6 Specification
> - ICMPv6 for IPv6 Specification
> - Neighbor Discovery
> - IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration
> - IPv6 Path MTU Discovery
>
> => These 5 protocols are supported by "Self_Test" package.
>
> - IPSec AH and ESP for IPv6
> - IPSec ESP for IPv6(UDP)
>
> => These 2 protocols are supported by "IPsec_Self_Test_P2" package,
> but we stopped to support AH anymore.
>
> - Mobility Support in IPv6 (ID-20) - Correspondent Node
> - Mobility Support in IPv6 (ID-20) - Home Agent
> - Mobility Support in IPv6 (ID-20) - Mobile Node
>
> => These 3 protocols are supported by "ct-mipv6-xxx" packages.
>
> - Prefix delegation
>
> => This protocol will be supported by
> upcoming version of "DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2" packages.
>
> - IPSec AH and ESP for IPv4
I've tried to launch it with the latest tools (REL_3_1_0) but I've got
an 'internal error':
vSend(Link0,echo_request_from_host1)
!!! "../ipsec/./HTR_E_common.def", line 109: error: syntax error near
' auth = hmacsha2_256('
!!! V6evalTool.pm vSend() return status=1
Regards,
Nicolas
> - IPSec AH and ESP for IPv4(UDP)
> - Default Router Preferences, More-Specific Routes, and Load Sharing
> - Default Address Selection for Internet Protocol version 6 (IPv6)
> - DNS discovery
> - IPv6 over IPv4 Tunnel
> - NAT-PT
> - Robustness
>
> => These 8 protocols are only in "ct-2.1.1".
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:27:31 +0200
> Nicolas Dichtel <nicodichtel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> on the web site (http://www.tahi.org/release/), ct-2.1.1 is always
>> referenced, but we know that this test_suite is not supported since a
>> long time.
>> In fact, with the latest test_tools (REL_3_1_0) there is many internal errors.
>>
>> Is there a good reason to keep a link to these tests?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nicolas
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
>