Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:01:52 -0500
From: <Jon_Franklin@Dell.com>
Subject: [users:01262] Re: To test with Self Test 1.4.5 or Self Test 4.0.5 ??
To: <users@tahi.org>
Message-Id: <C7035CAC203CAD42B62C2106F1AB465B9B5CB0@ausx3mpc103.aus.amer.dell.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A68ACAF.8080805@Sun.COM>
References: <0AD8623EA60A184CA4001BCF40ABD84F4EB75553D1@GVW1161EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <4A68ACAF.8080805@Sun.COM>
X-Mail-Count: 01262

I vote with Brett--a lot has changed in the requirements since ST 1.4.5,
so a retest would be good.  The issue for you would be cost, I guess.
The FAQ has some guidance, though:
http://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=faq#q12  This sounds like something
you'll want to ask the committee about.  

But if you're going to re-test, you'll have to use version 4.0.5, that's
pretty much a given.  But my advice is worth about as much as you paid
for it. :-)  The committee has final say.

--
Jon Franklin
jon_franklin@dell.com
x3-8143

-----Original Message-----
From: Brett.Lee@Sun.COM [mailto:Brett.Lee@Sun.COM] 
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 1:32 PM
To: users@tahi.org
Subject: [users:01261] Re: To test with Self Test 1.4.5 or Self Test
4.0.5 ??


Hi Sanjeev,

You should test with 4.0.5.

FWIW, if your product was certified using Self Test 1.4.5, I would 
strongly suggest re-cert whether it is required or not.

-Brett

Ghorpade, Sanjeev K (IPG HSSL) wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> I have a doubt with respect to log certification:
>  
> Say, A product series is certified for IPv6 Logo with Self-test
version 
> 1.4.5 (either Phase 1 or 2)
> Later a new product is launched under the same series without any 
> changes to IPv6 stack.  But by then a new version of Self-Test 4.0.5 
> exists. 
>  
> In this scenario should the new product be tested with :-
> 
>    1. Self Test 1.4.5 or
>    2. Self Test 4.0.5 but no Certification required or
>    3. Selft Test 4.0.5 and certification required.
> 
> which option would hold good? Pl Clarify,
>  
> Thanks,
> Sanjeev