Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:54:38 +0900
From: Yoshio Uomori <mario@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:01325] Re: DHCPv6 DUID any ?
To: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org
Message-Id: <20091007125438.86c9c112.mario@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <7FB2756086EC7F4083A69DF012C6BFC201733B14B6@HERMES.incognito.com>
References: <7FB2756086EC7F4083A69DF012C6BFC201733B14B6@HERMES.incognito.com>
X-Mail-Count: 01325

Hi Andre,

Thank you for your question.

In the beginning, could you send the test log?

Best Regards,
Yoshio Uomori


On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:06:23 -0700
Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> wrote:

> I'm attempting to use the DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2_1_0_17, and having some unexpected behaviours.  For the DHCP_CONF.2.1.1 test, part A (standard Solicit/Advertise/Request/Reply), TAHI appears to be sending the Request filling in the server ID with a DUID Any.  Two questions:
> 
> 
> 1)      Where is DUID Any defined in RFC?
> 
> 2)      Wouldn't sending a DUID any in a Request defeat the purpose of the Request?
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Yoshio Uomori <mario@tahi.org>