Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:57:04 -0700
From: Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com>
Subject: [users:01326] Re: DHCPv6 DUID any ?
To: "'mario@tahi.org'" <mario@tahi.org>
Cc: "'users@tahi.org'" <users@tahi.org>
Message-Id: <7FB2756086EC7F4083A69DF012C6BFC201732BF8D3@HERMES.incognito.com>
X-Mail-Count: 01326

Turns out I found the trigger.  My server was sending a duid-llt with a hardware type of 6 instead of 1.  This seems to cause tahi to revert to duid any instead of just copying the server duid from the advertise to the request.


----- Original Message -----
From: Yoshio Uomori <mario@tahi.org>
To: Andre Kostur
Cc: users@tahi.org <users@tahi.org>
Sent: Tue Oct 06 20:54:38 2009
Subject: Re: [users:01324] DHCPv6 DUID any ?

Hi Andre,

Thank you for your question.

In the beginning, could you send the test log?

Best Regards,
Yoshio Uomori


On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 12:06:23 -0700
Andre Kostur <akostur@incognito.com> wrote:

> I'm attempting to use the DHCPv6_Self_Test_P2_1_0_17, and having some unexpected behaviours.  For the DHCP_CONF.2.1.1 test, part A (standard Solicit/Advertise/Request/Reply), TAHI appears to be sending the Request filling in the server ID with a DUID Any.  Two questions:
> 
> 
> 1)      Where is DUID Any defined in RFC?
> 
> 2)      Wouldn't sending a DUID any in a Request defeat the purpose of the Request?
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Yoshio Uomori <mario@tahi.org>