Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:49:32 +0900
From: Hiroki ENDO <velo@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:01342] Re: Self-Test: Section 1: RFC 2460 - IPv6 Specification
To: "Rommel S. Laranjo" <rlaranjo@infoweapons.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org, Yukiyo Akisada <akisada@tahi.org>
Message-Id: <20091029194932.21c297f4.velo@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <4AE95139.5020002@infoweapons.com>
References: <4AE95139.5020002@infoweapons.com>
X-Mail-Count: 01342

Hello Rommel,

I reply instead of Akisada-san. He is out of office until next Wednesday.

I could confirm the invalid checksum.
It is probably a miscalculation of the ICMPv6 checksum.
Because the latest specification says nothing about ICMPv6 checksum value and
then the value should be correct.
Please refer to the latest specification.
<http://www.ipv6ready.org/docs/Core_Conformance_Latest.pdf>

The deep investigation will be late.
Thanks for your understanding,
--
Hiroki ENDO


On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:24:25 +0800
"Rommel S. Laranjo" <rlaranjo@infoweapons.com> wrote:

> Hello Akisada-san,
> 
> I have noticed that in Section 1 of RFC 2460 - IPv6 Specification, Test 
> #40 - Part A: Unrecognized Routing Type 33, Self-Test script attempts to 
> send and ICMPv6 packet with an Invalid ICMPv6 Checksum (please see Frame 
> #10 of the attached packet capture).
> 
> May I ask whether this is part of the test or its a miscalculation of 
> the icmpv6 packet checksum?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rommel
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  --------
> This email and any attachments are CONFIDENTIAL and may also be
> legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> immediately delete this message and any attachments, then notify
> security@infoweapons.com of such recipient error. Any forwarding,
> dissemination, distribution, re-posting or copying of this email
> and attachments is strictly prohibited. Thank you.
>  
>