Index: [Article Count Order] [Thread]

Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 16:55:51 +0900
From: Hiroki ENDO <velo@tahi.org>
Subject: [users:01344] Re: TAHI IKEV2 issue
To: Avesh Agarwal <avagarwa@redhat.com>
Cc: users@tahi.org, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20091030165551.74be789e.velo@tahi.org>
In-Reply-To: <4AEA02A1.7030307@redhat.com>
References: <4AEA02A1.7030307@redhat.com>
X-Mail-Count: 01344

Hello Avesh,

Thanks for your report.

I confirmed that your patch works well.
Additionally, I realized that I needed to modify the handling comparison
operators. They are also hardcoded.
I will apply this patch and make additional changes.

Thank you very much!
--
Hiroki ENDO


On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:01:21 -0400
Avesh Agarwal <avagarwa@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> While doing interoperatibility testing of Openswan with TAHI IKEv2 test 
> suite, I noticed that the processing of "critical bit" and "reserved" 
> files in the IKEv2 security association payload (SA payload) is 
> reversed, which affects the output of the log files (html files). In 
> addition, I also noticed that comparison of these fields with the 
> expected values is hardcoded. To address, these issues, I have attached 
> a patch with this email. The file changed is koi/libdata/kIKE/kJudge.pm. 
> I would appreciate any feedback on this.
> 
> Thanks and Regards
> Avesh Agarwal
>